PDA

View Full Version : WestJet looking for a US partner!


TheHangarCat
July 27, 2002, 08:57 AM
TSE.com WestJet News (http://tsedb.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/WireFeedRedirect?cf=GlobeInvestor/tsx/config&date=20020726&archive=gam&slug=RJETT)

WestJet looks for U.S. partner
Keith McArthur 00:00 EDT Friday, July 26, 2002

WestJet Airlines Ltd. is looking to team up with Southwest Airlines Co. or another no-frills carrier when it expands to the United States within the next three years.

Mark Hill, the company's vice-president of strategic planning, said that by working with a U.S. discount airline, WestJet could greatly expand the number of U.S. destinations it could market to passengers.

"When we go to the States, we'd be quite keen on doing something with a like-minded carrier to starburst out from somebody else's hub," Mr. Hill said in an interview.

Since it launched service in 1996 with two aircraft, WestJet has said it would eventually fly into the United States. The Calgary-based low-cost carrier, which will have 37 planes in its fleet by the end of the year, already runs charter flights to holiday destinations like Las Vegas.

WestJet officials have said the airline is two to three years away from flying into the United States.

But Mr. Hill said scheduled transborder flights could come sooner if the right kind of deal could be reached with Dallas-based Southwest Airlines, the pioneer of low-cost airlines.

"There isn't a like-minded airline in the world that wouldn't love to do something with Southwest, but at the end of the day, it's up to them to make a call. And if they want to do something with us, we will certainly build that into a business plan and see if it makes sense to us," Mr. Hill said.

In the past, both WestJet and Southwest have shied away from working with other carriers to transfer passengers (interlining) or share flight codes on aircraft.

But Mr. Hill said WestJet would reconsider that position if it could reach the right kind of deal with a U.S. partner.

Southwest spokeswoman Whitney Eichinger said the Dallas-based discounter has no plans to enter into any interlining or code-sharing agreements "at this time." But, she added, it is a Southwest rule to never say never.

Sam Barone, an independent airline analyst based in Ottawa, said a strategic alliance between WestJet and Southwest makes a lot of sense because the carriers are so similar.

He said WestJet could fly into a single destination in the United States -- say Chicago Midway Airport -- from which Southwest could carry passengers on to other U.S. cities.

Such an agreement could boost revenue for both carriers, Mr. Barone said.

"This is really the last frontier of the low-cost carrier in my view. There's never been a continental low-cost carrier between Canada and the United States. And so this might work."

Michael Linenberg, an analyst with Merrill Lynch in New York, said a WestJet-Southwest alliance has some merit. But he said that with the U.S. industry in such rough shape, he can't see it being a priority for Southwest.

Mr. Linenberg said a deal between WestJet and any U.S. discount carrier would have little impact on other airlines serving the transborder market.

"Air Canada would certainly lose some traffic, but I think it would be modest. It would be share shift, but lets call it minimal to modest."

Analysts said that in addition to Southwest, WestJet might pursue strategic alliances with other major no-frills airlines including New York-based JetBlue Airways Corp. or Orlando-based AirTran Airways, the operating unit of AirTran Holdings Inc.

Carla Frio, a spokeswoman for JetBlue, said the airline doesn't do any interlining, but isn't philosophically opposed to the idea.

yvr01
July 27, 2002, 09:33 AM
That would be cool for you guys! I love Westjet for having flown on you more than I can recall. You are getting bigger and that is very good news! Only hope you will fly into YUL or anywhere around Montreal soon!

buzz146
July 27, 2002, 02:26 PM
But, Southwest never would.
It is one of the ways to keep costs down by not inter-lining with other airlines, and, i doubt that SWA would stray from that philosophy after all this time.
jetBlue, a low-cost but not no-frills airline, does however provide inter-line with other airlines i believe.

bridget74
July 28, 2002, 10:25 PM
I don't know, buzz. True, one of Southwest's rules is not to interline, but it's also one of Southwest's rules to be flexible and demonstrate creativity when the situation calls for it. After 9/11, the rules changed completely. I would have never thought we would get rid of the plastic boarding cards, but we did. And I would never have thought we would do a non-stop transcon, but we're starting them in September. Nor did I ever think we would have automated checkin kiosks. Guess what's happening next?

I heard a little rumor that Herb sits on the board of WestJet? Is there any truth to this, or is it just that...a rumor? I personally figured it was, because for some reason it just didn't add up.

But I've also wondered if Southwest just won't start making flights into Canada themselves when the opportunity presents itself. With the -700 and a base in BWI...who knows? Similarly, with a base in HOU, we could also one day start flights to Mexico. Granted, there are many opportunities left in the continental U.S. for SWA that they would pursue first, but as some of our 25+ year employees have said to me: "Hey, we never thought we would fly outside of Texas!"

I think if WestJet and Southwest could reach a deal that Southwest found acceptable, an interline deal could happen. But WestJet would have to prove that such a deal could be financially feasible, and I think it would be a hard sell. Who knows? I don't personally see it happening, but I've been shocked before. images/icons/grin.gif

westjet_freak
July 28, 2002, 11:53 PM
U.S... Oh boy. That Myrill Lynch person does not know what WestJet is truly about. JetBlue has a good shot because of Mr.David Neelman. So that woman might not know the connection between the two carriers. So these are the possible codeshares:
WestJet-SouthWest
WestJet-AirTran (not good ie: ValuJet-AirTran)
WestJet-JetBlue
I think JetBlue makes the most sense. But WestJet should do a YUL run before trying anything trans-border. As for the competition for trans-border there was a surge when WestJet started doing YYZ so imagine the surge for trans-border.

wssupportguy
August 15, 2002, 11:33 PM
Hey all

I suspect that Jet Blue is a better match for us. A couple of reasons behind that one...

Mr. Nealeman was approached to be our first CEO, but ended up being a consultant. We have maintained that ongoing good relationship.

Also, we use the same computer system. Matching up would be so much easier from an IT side.

The downside is that Jet Blue is still small. Growing yes, but small.

The current hub in JFK, would be okey for Florida destinations, but not so great to the west coast. That's temporary of course, with the move in to LAS for Jet Blue this fall... we'll have to see.

If we did hook up, well, wouldn't that be wild?

As for Herb, although we have visited many times, and also have a great relationship with Southwest, he has never been on the board of directors of WestJet.

Thanks all
wssupportguy

bridget74
August 15, 2002, 11:45 PM
Thanks for the clarification. I figured it was just a rumor. images/icons/smile.gif