PDA

View Full Version : Airline rapped over 'misleading' ad


flyBE
July 10, 2002, 01:58 PM
The low cost airline and Air France franchise British European has criticised by the advertising watchdog for claims it made about cheap fares.
The airline's newspaper advert promoted fares from £25 one way, "all inclusive and with no hidden extras".

And it said that flights went from Belfast or London to destinations in France.
But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the advert - which has since been withdrawn -was misleading because it implied the £25 fare was available for all destinations listed on the advert.

The ASA also upheld a complaint which challenged whether British European operated one of the advertised services, between London and Toulouse.

Changes made

British European said the small print in the adverts had made it clear that the £25 fare was not available to all destinations, and that "prices may vary by route".

But it said it had no plans to repeat the wording in future adverts.

And British European said the London-Toulouse service was operated by Air France.

The airline said it had a partnership with Air France which allowed it to sell Air France flights using its own flight numbers, which the company said was common practice within the industry.

British European said it had now withdrawn this type of advert.

General manager of marketing for British European, Simon Lilley, said he was annoyed to discover that one of the complaints had come from a rival low cost airline.

"I don't think the Advertising Standards Authority's role is a vehicle for organisations to complain about a competitor," Mr Lilley told BBC Radio Five Live.

"Lots of actual customers enjoyed low fare travel from that advertisement and we didn't have one complaint."
Lots of actual customers enjoyed low fare travel from that advertisement and we didn't have one complaint images/icons/grin.gif images/icons/grin.gif

bmibunny
July 26, 2002, 04:31 AM
At long last BE is trying to beat the 'low cost' airlines at their own game. Good Luck to them I say. I've heard that it was one of the so called 'low cost' airline that complained to Advertising Standards Authority.

Perhaps they are getting worried that the mainline premium airlines are matching them on price with a better deal for passengers at the same time. to me, BE are simply following the example set by the 'low cost' arilines in their advertising.

BRING IT ON!!!!!!

bmibunny
July 29, 2002, 03:42 PM
FLYBE is to evaluate the CRJ900 as a possible replacement to their aging fleet of BAe146.

True or rumour?

flyBE
August 16, 2002, 06:18 AM
Originally posted by bmibunny:
FLYBE is to evaluate the CRJ900 as a possible replacement to their aging fleet of BAe146.

True or rumour?<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana ">With the current fleet of Dash 8 and CRJ-200s, flyBE is evaluating the 70 seat CRJ-700 and 80 seat CRJ-900 as possible replacement aircraft for the future.
So ... possible announcement in next few months.

BE146
August 18, 2002, 09:11 AM
I have too heard that the CRJ-700 and/or -900 could be coming to flyBE soon.
Apparently announcement this winter, in time for the new services.
Is LCY big enough tho for the -900?

flyBE
August 19, 2002, 09:23 AM
There has been some stuff BE146 that the CRJ-900 is too large to be able to park at the stands at LCY.
But is it bigger than a 146?
I have no idea.
Like you said, the expansion announcement will be made in the winter schedule some time.